Daniel Calista, Founder & CEO, Vynamic. In 2011, voted Philadelphia’s Best Place to Work and Consulting Magazine named them One of Seven Small Jewels.
Practicing Your Value Proposition:
Pursuing your core value as your top priority can lead to satisfying fulfillment – and extraordinary growth. In fact, if your mantra is “to grow for your people, not at the expense of your people”, you might grow:
- at the rate of 35% per year
- from 1 person to over 50
- to being voted #1 Best Place to Work Medium Size Company in Philadelphia.
You’d be Vynamic.
Of course, it’s not as simple as focusing on your own people. For Vynamic the mission was also based on an innovative approach – applying the lessons learned in a premier general consultancy to a very specific field – healthcare. They combined their dedication to workplace with a focus on a growing and underserved industry.
In 2002, Vynamic was started with only a laptop and a dream. But Dan Calista, its founder, knew the importance of human resources. As a consultancy, human is virtually the only resource. While working with the large Andersen Consulting/Accenture, Dan enjoyed the advantage of premium benefits at the same time that he endured the limiting effect of being a small cog in a big wheel at the beck and call of an unfeeling hierarchy. He determined to bring the advantages of a professional state-of-the-art human resource department to his employees while avoiding the almost inhuman demands of a large company.
Partnering with Insperity, he was relieved of the legal and administrative stress of being an employer. Dan was able to concentrate on making Vynamic a great place to work. He grew to six employees in the first year. He now has 55 employees and has hired an in-house Director of Human Resources to work with Insperity’s Emerging Growth Business Performance Advisors.
Vynamic was founded on employee selection, conditions, and treatment to such an extent that it enhanced the company brand. While Dan Calista is looking at professionalizing other aspects of his business, employees, who Dan refers to as the “team”, will always be at the core of his success. Visit http://www.vynamic.com/#/team to see how Vynamic leverages the team advantage.
What value proposition could you professionalize to grow your company and attain your goals?
John Penrose, Wharton MBA and Business Builder, is in search of a business partner to pilot the technique described below.
Customers can’t tell you that……
Why can’t our customers tell us what’s really important? Maybe the way we ask them to articulate what’s important about our product or service is the problem. Unfortunately, increasingly complex, expensive and artificial market research approaches don’t help much. Wharton MBA John Penrose and his PhD colleague have developed a new, refreshingly simple approach – based on real life trade-offs – that makes it easier for customers (employees, vendors, etc.) to tell you what really matters to them. They’re looking for a beta partner to help document the power of their technique. It’s a free chance to learn something valuable about your customers.
When presented with a reasonable set of things (say, the features of a new car), customers will typically rate those things similarly. As a result, the features all appear important. This mash-up makes extracting actionable insight from customer data almost impossible. If you’ve ever tried to interpret the difference between a 3.4 and a 3.5 average survey score, then you’ve experienced this problem. If you’ve resorted to testing the statistical difference between the two scores, you’ve fallen even deeper into the trap (significance isn’t always meaningful difference).
The trap occurs when we ask customers to do something they don’t actually do in real life: make decisions in a vacuum. Most surveys present one feature at a time, resulting in multiple, independent evaluations. In real life consumers decide based on the total value they derive from trade-offs among all the things involved in the decision. In the car analogy style is important but so are mileage, comfort, reliability, price, brand image, financing….
Market researchers have spent years developing more and more complex techniques to understand how consumers make these trade-offs (does conjoint ring a bell?). These approaches can yield great insight but they also consume significant resources, and their complexity can confuse customers and compromise the results. There has to be a better way!
We have developed a real life, trade-off technique that allows each user to array a product’s relevant features in a simple priority structure. The results deliver much more realistic measures for each feature that you can compare across demographics and tracked over time. Thus far, we’re seeing real differences among features where conventional approaches have shown none.
We’re looking for a business partner to pilot the technique. We’ll conduct the study and interpret the findings at no charge. You’ll get insight to drive better decisions with greater confidence, and we’ll document the results on an anonymous basis. Contact John Penrose at 617-962-0888 or johnpenrose@verizon.net to learn more.
It’s your turn. Do either of these ring a cord with you? Tell us by posting your thoughts on this blog.